The problem is that the Up-In-Armers want to make some
changes and that makes us Channel Surfers have to stand up and say something.
What are some libraries doing? Well, right now there’s a lot
of librarian discussions about what different systems are planning to do with
Armstrong books. You’ve probably seen the viral picture from Manly Library, Sydney, Australia.
And word on the listservs is that several Southern
California libraries will actually remove Armstrong books from their
collections. That, in my, and I’m sure other librarians’ opinions, is where
the line gets crossed.
First of all, think about it from a capitalistic point of
view: Now that there’s a controversy, the books are more likely to circulate,
so you’re limiting your own circulation by not letting those books go out.
Now
from a library activist's point of view: Dude. We’re not here to censor. We’re
not here to define truth or lies for people. Libraries exist to provide the
public with the tools to make those decisions for themselves. You cross the
line when you start to make decisions for the public telling them what they can’t
read. And I don’t want to hear someone come back with a jab at collection
development policies. I’m focusing here on banned books and censoring. Think
about what Reverend Shaw Moore in Footloose (1984) said:
"The devil isn't
in these books. It's in here. It's in our hearts."
Why are Mythologies and Folklore found in the nonfiction
section? Mythology is usually based in religion or a belief system and is or
was believed to be true. Folklore is often true stories that have been
stretched by the telephone game of time and distance. Basically, both myth and
folklore are based in truth or are believed to be true by one or more groups of
people.
Lance Armstrong really did what he did, whether he did it with help or not. That all really happened. It wasn't CGI or Photoshop.
Lance Armstrong really did what he did, whether he did it with help or not. That all really happened. It wasn't CGI or Photoshop.
Process that and then think about what you should do with Lance
Armstrong books.
4 comments:
You make a very valid point. I didn't care much for this whole controversy since I never was a fan of his or anything but it did stink that he lied and used drugs and ruined a lot of lives along the way through his lawyers and in interviews. But changing the way his books are displayed and where they are found in libraries crosses a big line. I'm surprised that I didn't hear about this.
Post a Comment